Laura Siegemund vs Ipek Senoglu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siegemund vs Senoglu analysis and find out who is favored!
Laura Siegemund vs Ipek Senoglu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siegemund 0 - 0 Senoglu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siegemund has won 47.51% of points on their second serve, while Senoglu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siegemund, in recent form, has won 58.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Senoglu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siegemund has saved 54.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Senoglu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siegemund has won 65.31% of matches played (W/L 32/ 17), with Senoglu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 339/ 181), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 125/ 120). Senoglu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 40/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/ 7), where as Senoglu has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siegemund has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.86 while Senoglu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siegemund has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Senoglu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siegemund has converted 49.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Senoglu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
16
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
45
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Laura Siegemund vs Ipek Senoglu For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Siegemund VS Senoglu
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Laura Siegemund | Ipek Senoglu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (45/34) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (391/349) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 17 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
DFs Total | 81 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:10:23 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 154.13 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 75% (1794/2396) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 57% (1017/1794) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (286/602) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (169/339) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (1197/2484) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (19/32) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 40% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Kateryna Baindl
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lauren Davis
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sofia Kenin
Player
Laura Siegemund
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Laura Siegemund
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Anna Blinkova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Laura Siegemund
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
82%
(
72 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
77 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatrice Ricci
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Ipek Senoglu Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Maria-Elena Camerin
Player
Ipek Senoglu
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Natalie Grandin
Player
Ipek Senoglu
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Olga Govortsova
Player
Ipek Senoglu
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more